Good Neighbors
Unfortunately, in the realm of politics, ideas are not able to be debated because political correctness has already dictated that "the world is flat" and not only will no amount of data suggesting otherwise change this belief, but anyone calling attention to it will be labeled a heretic and their ideas dismissed from consideration. This is a well-established liberal/socialist approach to achieving political goals - don't compete on the merits but shout down your opponents, intimidate them and label them "racist" or "elitist". If someone has unpopular ideas then they are racist, and no-one needs to consider the views of a racist, do they?
This was demonstrated just recently in the UK, where residents were invited to comment on the proposed siting of a "travellers camp", a euphemistic name for a piece of land where benefit-scrounging pseudo-gypsy bastards park their caravans and from whence they embark on a litter-strewing, thieving, burglarizing, mugging and drinking assault on the local community. Everyone knows this is the case but no-one is allowed to say so because under EU law it would be "hate-speech" towards the "Romany" people who supposedly make up the travelling community. (Never mind that they are mostly of Irish descent and no more Romany than you are.)
The point is that by labeling certain points of view racist, the liberal establishment effectively prevents anyone expressing them. Even if they can't throw people in prison for having those views, they don't need to compete with the ideas on the basis of logic or fact; they can simply be shouted down.
One of the side-effects of the housing crisis has apparently been an influx of black "Section 8" renters into more affluent neighborhoods, as cash-strapped mortgage holders opt for the stable government-subsidized income from these renters as a means to survive financially. This has apparently resulted in an increase in crime and anti-social behavior, but to say so immediately invites charges of racism, as this story shows. The liberals can wring their hands all they want, but anyone who suggests that an influx of families from the projects won't increase crime is talking out of their arse. Who the fuck do you think commits the crime in the projects? The crime fairy? It's not someone else, it's the people who live there, and it's not as though there's some magic filter to sieve out the scum when they move out. Just ask the people in Houston who experienced the massive crime influx when New Orleans exported its inner city black population.
"Oh Mr Bison, you're just a racist - we don't need to listen to you, blah, blah, blah." Bullshit - try looking at the facts. Every night on the news I hear about killings in North St.Louis, and the footage always shows wide streets of fine brick houses, considerably better built than my wood shack. These used to be wealthy suburbs before large numbers of black people moved in and "white flight" left them monochromatic. Now people talk about white flight as though this was the "sin" that caused the decline of these neighborhoods. Fuck off! When the nasty white racists left, the neighborhoods were fine - everything that happened since then was done by the black people who moved in, but you won't find a single politician who will say so, because they'd be "racist".
The schools in these areas are often violent, and routinely are accused of failing the children, but no-one suggests that maybe it's the children who are violent, and the children who are failing the schools. You see, buildings aren't violent; houses aren't criminal and streets don't join gangs and sell drugs. People do. And when you export people with those values to "nice" communities, you don't magically transform them.
Funnily enough, it's the same values that enable people to escape poverty that would make them fit into "nice" society - respect for hard work, education, the law, family, property and individual responsibility. I've seen the reality with my own eyes - a well-maintained suburban house with a pool, in a top school district rendered near-derelict over the period of little more than a year. Rusty cars in the drive, a chain-link fence with a pit-bull, the pool water turned black, guttering hanging off down to the ground and unrepaired, police SWAT teams in attendance, garden ruined, rusted bikes and garbage left outside. Eventually the black occupants left and the new owners have spent weeks working to render the house habitable. But it wasn't their black skin which was the root of the problem - the black bloke over the road was a great neighbor - but the values (or lack thereof) that they brought with them.
For as long as we refuse to criticize the people who have made the cess-pit communities what they are, and shift the blame onto whitey, we won't make any meaningful changes. And it's not about money. Even if you reward indolence with free money, even if you pay for all these "poor, disadvantaged people" to move into nice suburban houses, how long do you think it will be until they have wrought the same destruction, crime and misery there? That's the massive fraud perpetrated on our society by the perpetuation of this myth of the "victims" - it's not their fault, therefore it must be society's fault, so society must pay for their failure, over and over and over again.
One thing basic to the scientific method is cause and effect. If you pay no attention in school, get no qualifications, commit crime, can't get a job and then produce multiple offspring which you cannot afford, it's your own fucking fault. Priority one might not be to get a pit bull and some gold jewelry, and it certainly should not be the responsibility of those of us who made the effort to pay for you wankers to live in the house next door through Section 8 just so you can fuck up our lives too.
Just don't expect to hear this issue debated freely any time soon.
Copyright © 2008 Edward Bison






